Latest News

Back to Latest News back

 

Sport rorts inquiry implicates Prime Minister Scott Morrison

Sport rorts inquiry implicates Prime Minister Scott Morrison
February 27, 2020

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has been drawn into the sports grants controversy after it was revealed his office exchanged 136 emails with former Federal Sports Minister Bridget McKenzie’s office about the program.

Submissions to the Senate inquiry into the Federal Government’s controversial Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program contradicted Prime Minister Morrison’s previous denials of any detailed knowledge of the allocation of funds from the program,

Prime Minister Morrison has maintained that his involvement in the $100 million infrastructure program was limited to his office passing on representations from MPs to Senator McKenzie’s office.

However, in an answer to the Senate inquiry, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) revealed that between 17th October 2018 and 11th April 2019 Senator McKenzie and Prime Minister Morrison’s office exchanged 136 emails about the program.

The documents also reveal Senator McKenzie wrote back to the prime minister on 10th April 2019 - the day before the election was called - with the list of projects she proposed to fund, summarised by state, political party and electorate. On 11th April, the day the election was called, the Minister sent the final list to Sport Australia.

With sporting clubs that missed out came on funds from the program complaining to a Senate inquiry, a Senate order for production of documents revealed Prime Minister Morrison attended an event at the Sans Souci Football Club, which was given $50,000 despite its project nearly having been completed.

Documents produced to the Senate yesterday revealed that the Prime Minister’s office was informed before he attended an event at the Sans Souci Football Club on 11th July last year that “it is worth noting that the club initially missed out on the first two rounds of funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure grant program”.

The document stated “the club was subsequently funded in round three. During the intervening period, the club has fundraised and the project is almost completed.”

A spokesman for the Prime Minister said the project was “approved for funding by the then Minister for Sport based on its assessed eligibility by Sport Australia.

“It was the responsibility of the applicants and Sport Australia to have ensured all projects met the eligibility criteria.”

Earlier in February, the ANAO told the Senate inquiry that 43% of projects funded were not eligible, mostly because they had started or completed work by the time a funding agreement was signed.

In a scathing report released last month the ANAO found the program was skewed towards marginal or Coalition target seats.

In submissions to the Senate inquiry, the Gippsland Ranges Roller Derby, which met all criteria for fuding, has said it is “incredibly disappointed” with the politicisation of the program, while the North Shore Country Club has threatened to join possible legal action.

Plaintiff law firms Slater and Gordon and Maurice Blackburn have both proposed class actions or tests cases, citing concerns the grants may be unconstitutional and the ANAO finding that it was “not evident” what Senator McKenzie’s authority was to give grants.

Prime Minister Morrison has suggested clubs that missed out could be funded in a further round of the program but has not made a concrete commitment.

The North Shore Country Club, which provides tennis facilities in Kallaroo, Western Australia, submitted that it was unable to fund its project to improve accessibility and female facilities, while other clubs received funding despite not being eligible when agreements were signed for projects that would have been built anyway.

As reported by Guardian Australia, constitutional expert Anne Twomey submitted that program guidelines were invalid because they nominated Senator McKenzie as “the final approver of grants” and reiterated her view that “most of the funding given to projects under the scheme was unlawful because there was no constitutional head of power to support it”.

The Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies at Melbourne University agreed that there was “no plausible head of legislative power to support most and, perhaps, all (of the grants)”.

Sport Australia submitted that it had accepted the three recommendations of the ANAO to manage the expected level of demand for programs, improve conflict of interest procedures and assessment records. It did not comment on what the legal authority was for Senator McKenzie to make grants.

Images: Scott Morrison at Sans Souci Football Club (top, courtesy of Sans Souci Football Club/Facebook) and Senator Bridget McKenzie while Federal Sports Minister (below).

Related Articles

21st February 2020 - Kate Palmer agrees to give evidence to sports grants inquiry

24th February 2020 - Federal Sports Minister considers big changes in Government funding arrangements

15th February 2020 - Report from Secretary to Prime Minister’s Department rejects Audit Office finding that sports grant program targeted marginal electorates

14th February 2020 - Sport Australia slammed for extravagant spending on offices and consultants

4th February 2020 - Former Sports Minister Bridget McKenzie bypassed Sport Australia board to authorise $2.5 million grant to Netball Australia

2nd February 2020 - Sports rorts scandal sees National deputy leader Bridget McKenzie resign from Government

29th January 2020 - Former Sports Minister Bridget McKenzie warned that sports grant program was compromised

25th January 2020 - Former Sports Minister Bridget McKenzie approved more than $1 million in grants for shooting clubs

23rd January 2020 - ‘Sports rorts’ review to be assessed by Prime Minister’s department

23rd January 2020 - ‘Sports rorts’ scandal: Revelation that upmarket golf, rowing and tennis clubs received major grants

22nd January 2020 - More than $1 million in sport grants given to nine clubs linked to Coalition MPs

13th February 2020 - National Audit Office advises 43% of successful Federal Government sports fund projects were ineligible

16th January 2020 - Audit Office sports grants report cites ‘conflict of interest’ at Sport Australia

15th January 2020 - Audit Office report confirms that Federal Government targeted marginal seats with potentially illegal sports grants

23rd November 2019 - Former Government lawyer says Federal Minister’s Community Sport Infrastructure allocations were ‘illegal’

20th May 2019 - Federal Government Community Sporting Infrastructure Grants invests over $100 million

16th April 2019 - MP presents $1.5 million novelty cheque to sports club despite funds not being approved

7th February 2020 - Reports reveal Federal Government ‘quietly spent’ $150 million female sports program funds on aquatic centre projects in marginal seats


Asking a small favour
We hope that you value the news that we publish so while you're here can we ask for your support?

The news we publish at www.ausleisure.com.au is independent, credible (we hope) and free for you to access, with no pay walls and no annoying pop-up ads.

However, as an independent publisher, can we ask for you to support us by subscribing to the printed Australasian Leisure Management magazine - if you don't already do so.

Published bi-monthly since 1997, the printed Australasian Leisure Management differs from this website in that it publishes longer, in-depth and analytical features covering aquatics, attractions, entertainment, events, fitness, parks, recreation, sport, tourism and venues management.

Subscriptions cost just $90 a year.

Click here to subscribe.

 

supplier directory

The Complete Guide to Leisure Industry Products & Services.

See the directory see all

PRIAVA

About Priava's Technology -  Priava is a cloud-based and centralised venue and event management system aimed at venues of all sizes. With its familiar and easy-to-use web interface, the…

read more

Attractions / Billing / Entertainment / Events / Technology

 
 

COMMERCIAL AQUATICS AUSTRALIA

Commercial Aquatics Australia provides aquatic solutions nationwide and is one of the largest and most experienced companies specialising in the design, construction, renovation, service, maintenance…

read more

Aquatics / Design / Play / Waterparks

 
 

Summit Fitness

Summit Fitness Equipment is now part of NovoFit - see www.ausleisure.com.au/suppliers/novofit/

read more

Fitness / Recreation / Technology / Wellness

 
 

State Wide Pool Services

Known as Hydrilla since September 2020 - see www.ausleisure.com.au/suppliers/hydrilla-pty-ltd

read more

Aquatics

 
 

PlayRope

Playrope Aqua-Fun, are the Australian & New Zealand exclusive distributors for Vortex Aquatic Structures International, the world leader in aquatic playgrounds and urban water landscapes.…

read more

Aquatics / Attractions / Parks / Play / Recreation

 
 

ProSlide Technology

ProSlide is the global leader in water ride design and manufacturing, supplying high-performance water attractions to new and expanding water parks around the world. For over three decades, ProSlide…

read more

Aquatics / Play / Waterparks

 
 

SENtag

Developed in Europe, this innovative system offers a safety management solution for swimming pools that checks individual swimmers via their wristband - monitoring their depth and time. Sensors…

read more

Aquatics / Hospitality / Safety / Technology / Waterparks

 
 

SWIMPLEX AQUATICS

Swimplex Aquatics are a world-class company dedicated to the commercial pool, waterslide industry. We are Australian market leaders servicing all states Australia wide. Swimplex provide a full…

read more

Aquatics / Attractions / Design / Play / Waterparks

 
 
 
 

get listed with our suppliers directory

Get your business noticed in our targeted directory. Viewed by 10,000 industry professionals per week!

list your business