Dr Ken Marriott asks whether today’s modern aquatic and recreation centres are really serving the community?
The veteran industry consultant suggests that “the most simple answer to this question is ‘we really just don’t know’ while a more informed response, based on dozens of case studies, is most likely to be ‘largely not!’”
Dr Marriott writes: the ‘we really just don’t know’ response is based on the fact that the research has just not been done. Aquatic recreation centres are seen as a ‘public good’: they are considered to generate healthy outcomes, they get strong support from many in the community, they often make a profit, they are a service to the community. With such ‘strengths’, few of these centres have seen a need to delve into whether they are warranted, what they are really achieving, who for and whether it’s the most effective expenditure of community funds.
Here’s some of the questions that are not being asked or answered…which reams of evidence suggest are being ignored:
- Has the provision been based on an extensive assessment of wide community needs (not just aquatic recreation) or is provision the result of pressure from certain interests in the community (such as swimming clubs, councillors, schools), the desire to look good in the eyes of the community, or the desire to have a venue just like the Council next door?
- Has an assessment been made of whether provision of an aquatic centre is the best use of Council funds? Were for example, health, education, employment, transport and parking alternatives explored at the same time as aquatic provision?
- Was an analysis of the projected return on investment made before development occurred and if not, why? If so, did the provision proposal “stack up”?
- Why are so many of the modern aquatic recreation centres so similar… even down to nearly all being ‘ARCs’ … except in communities like Frankston? Why, even in municipalities with more than one such venue, are there so few differences between them?
- Who are and who are not the clients - in terms of age, gender, socio-economic status, cultural backgrounds, physical abilities and disabilities, and why are there such big participation gaps across these groups? Interestingly, the same questions can be asked of management and staffing
- Why are such tiny proportions of a venue’s catchment population members or regular users? How do these figures compare with other leisure and recreation provision?
- What catchments are served and which are overlooked? How far do people come, what influences travel patterns and what does this say about the scale, mix and frequency of provision?
- Perhaps most critically, what are the personal, psychological, health, economic and wellbeing beneficial outcomes derived from provision and do these accrue to the total community or just users?
Decades of involvement in planning and evaluating aquatic recreation centres suggests to the author that few Councils have the information to answer these questions. Yet the extensive anecdotal evidence that exists suggests that if they did have the answers, what they provide could well be very different. Being a ‘community good’ is just not good enough when billions of dollars has now been invested in these venues.
Editor’s note: Australasian Leisure Management welcomes opinion from professionals across the industry on topics they are knowledgeable and/or passionate about.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org with your ideas, thoughts and/or contributions.
14th November 2021 - IAKS releases project case studies from aquatic centres around the world
12th November 2021 - New Royal Life Saving research shows social impact of the aquatic industry
11th November 2021 - Swimplex Aquatics stays busy despite the challenges of the last 20 months
25th October 2021 - National Aquatic Industry Committee releases updated guidelines for managing the risk of COVID-19 in aquatic facilities
30th September 2021 - Northcote Aquatic and Recreation Centre redevelopment to deliver 6 Star Green Star building
16th September 2021 - City of Canterbury-Bankstown reveals concept design for leisure and aquatic centre redevelopment
13th September 2021 - Aquatics and Recreation Institute charts sector’s roadmap to reopening
10th September 2021 - Tender to be released for $15 million North Bellarine aquatic facility
6th September 2021 - 90% of aquatic facility owners, operators and staff heading towards becoming fully vaccinated
6th September 2021 - Queensland Aquatic Industry Alliance reports on success over past 18 months
2nd September 2021 - Leisure and recreation planners need to take more decisive action on climate and weather change
2nd September 2021 - City of Mandurah investigates cause of Aquatic and Recreation Centre’s roof damage
27th August 2021 - Port Hedland Council endorses aquatic facility masterplan
27th August 2021 - Aquatic and fitness facilities reopen as Northern Territory Government eases COVID restrictions in Greater Darwin and Katherine
23rd August 2021 - Royal Life Saving provides guidance on COVID-19 vaccinations and aquatic facilities
10th August 2021 - Aquatic industry delivers $9 billion in economic, health and social benefits to Australia
9th August 2021 - Y NSW calls on NSW Government to support the survival of community sport, aquatics and recreation sector
30th July 2021 - Council-owned company responsible for Moree Artesian Aquatic Centre operations goes into liquidation
19th December 2020 - New Community Leisure and Recreation Planning text a product of authors’ decades of experience
10th December 2020 - City of Wanneroo to survey residents for views on aquatic and sport facility design
31st August 2020 - National Sports Convention events to address the future of aquatic, recreation and sports facilities
18th June 2020 - Consultants Otium highlight how aquatic and recreation projects stimulate local communities
21st November 2019 - IAKS document charts future global trends for public pools
8th June 2019 - Recreation Aotearoa releases aquatic facility design guide
1st November 2013 - Frankston City Council names new aquatic centre
3rd October 2012 - Enrolments open for Recreation Planning Diploma
Asking a small favour
We hope that you value the news that we publish so while you're here can we ask for your support?
The news we publish at www.ausleisure.com.au is independent, credible (we hope) and free for you to access, with no pay walls and no annoying pop-up ads.
However, as an independent publisher, can we ask for you to support us by subscribing to the printed Australasian Leisure Management magazine - if you don't already do so.
Published bi-monthly since 1997, the printed Australasian Leisure Management differs from this website in that it publishes longer, in-depth and analytical features covering aquatics, attractions, entertainment, events, fitness, parks, recreation, sport, tourism and venues management.
Subscriptions cost just $90 a year.
Click here to subscribe.