ASADA says confidentiality vital to anti-doping process

July 30, 2019

In a move to clarify the processes in the wake of swimmer Shayna Jack’s recent positive drugs test, the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) has advised that legally-binding confidentiality agreements are vital to its doping investigations.

The positive test by Jack prior to the recent Swimming World Championships was not immediately publicly revealed, with Swimming Australia saying it could not detail the information.

Swimming Australia Chief Executive Leigh Russell advised yesterday that the body had to wait until Jack or ASADA released details of the positive test.

Speaking to the Nine Network yesterday, Russell advised “it would have been so much easier for us at Swimming Australia to be transparent about the adverse test finding as soon as we were notified.

“Certainly that would have been an incredibly easier proposition for us than perhaps waiting for Shayna or ASADA to release information.”

Later on Monday, ASADA released a statement about its processes, stressing it should not be attributed specifically to the Jack case. ASADA said it had, since 2006, entered into legally-binding confidentiality undertakings with sporting organisations which restrict what the organisations could say.

The statement advised “this is, and always has been, ASADA’s standard practice.

“One of the reasons as to why ASADA has these agreements is to protect the integrity of our investigations.”

ASADA said it was one of a few anti-doping organisations globally with investigation powers under legislation, noting “it is ASADA’s standard practice to conduct a thorough investigation in relation to all allegations of doping in Australian sport, including when an athlete returns a ‘positive’ test result.

“This enables ASADA to assess the veracity of an athlete’s claims and determine whether other athletes or support persons are involved in a broader anti-doping issue, as well as taking into account the rights and welfare of the athlete. More importantly, our investigations enable ASADA to target facilitators who may be preying on Australian sport and our athletes.”

ASADA said it assessed whether to go public with information on a case-by-case basis, adding “often it is not in ASADA’s interests for our investigation to be public in the early phase of our processes.

“In simple terms, what would a facilitator of doping do if they were to become aware of ASADA’s investigation? From our experience, evidence could be destroyed, or our investigation frustrated by the fact that it was subject to public commentary.”

ASADA said it could “never restrict an athlete’s right to discuss or talk about their case”.

Jack, who faces a ban that looks set to end her participation in the Tokyo Olympics, says she will fight to clear her name.

It was also revealed that Jack had last year promoted a sports nutrition supplement, although there is no suggestion that the product was related to her positive test.

Swim school operator Kingswim, for whom Jack had been an ambassador, has removed all references to her from its website.

Images: Shayna Jack (top, courtesy of Instagram) and promoting the Extremo Sports Nutrition product in 2018 (below, courtesy of Instagram).

29th July 2019 - Swimming Australia scrutinised over handling of Shayna Jack doping result

24th July 2019 - Athlete rights crucial to sporting integrity

23rd July 2019 - Mack Horton and Swimming Australia face official rebuke over ‘drug cheat’ protest

22nd August 2018 - ASADA Chief Executive David Sharpe says integrity reforms can end doping conflicts

28th March 2018 - Swimming Australia appoints Leigh Russell as new Chief Executive

18th July 2016 - FINA partners with national anti-doping organisations ahead of the 2016 Rio Olympics

2nd December 2015 - ACT organisations back Royal Life Saving ACT for inaugural Canberra ‘A Day At The Lake’ event

9th May 2014 - New ASADA chief issues warning to potential cheats

Asking a small favour
We hope that you value the news that we publish so while you're here can we ask for your support?

The news we publish at www.ausleisure.com.au is independent, credible (we hope) and free for you to access, with no pay walls and no annoying pop-up ads.

However, as an independent publisher, can we ask for you to support us by subscribing to the printed Australasian Leisure Management magazine - if you don't already do so.

Published bi-monthly since 1997, the printed Australasian Leisure Management differs from this website in that it publishes longer, in-depth and analytical features covering aquatics, attractions, entertainment, events, fitness, parks, recreation, sport, tourism and venues management.

Subscriptions cost just $90 a year.

Click here to subscribe.