AusLeisure

A University of Queensland survey of 1,000 people has revealed that while most supported Brisbane hosting the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games, few planned to attend the opening or closing ceremonies.

This is the first of six planned studies that will be released at two-year intervals leading up to and after the 2032 Games.

The research project aims to build a deeper understanding of South-East Queensland residents’ attitudes and support towards the Games, including whether they believed the event would create jobs, help with housing accessibility and affordability or improve the state’s overall appearance.

Professor Brent Ritchie, Dean of UQ’s Business School, said while 70% of survey participants agreed or strongly agreed with hosting the Games, only 28% said they were likely to attend the opening ceremony and 22% the closing ceremony.

Support for hosting the Games was also lower among residents living outside of Brisbane as well as residents aged over 50 years.

Professor Ritchie added “further research is necessary to determine whether this is related to safety concerns, accessibility, cost or convenience.

“Momentum-building activities should be introduced in the lead-up to the Games to engage the community and build excitement, especially for non-Brisbane and older residents.”

A total of 1074 residents completed the survey in November using professional crowdsourcing company Dynata, with 859 responses used in the final analysis.

The Games were thought of as a ‘strong promoter’ of Queensland as a tourism destination by 82% of those surveyed.

More than 78% believed the event would bring employment opportunities and boost trade for local and small businesses and 64% said it was very likely or likely there would be improvements to Queensland’s appearance due to changes in the lead-up.

There was also a strong belief the Games would increase participation in sport and encourage an active lifestyle, with 72% of those surveyed agreeing it was very likely or likely.

But there was scepticism around whether the event would contribute to housing affordability and accessibility, with 47% saying it was very unlikely or unlikely.

Many respondents were also neutral or sceptical about whether the Games would deliver sustainability benefits and achieve meaningful environmental outcomes.

Professor Ritchie said it was unclear why 74% of those surveyed had indicated they would prefer to watch Olympic events on television instead of attending in person.

Related Articles

28th March 2025 - Paddle Australia has mixed response to Brisbane 2032 Olympic & Paralympic Games venue announcement

26th March 2025 - Smart approach to construction vital for delivery of Brisbane 2032 Games

26th March 2025 - ASM Global’s Harvey Lister ‘disappointed’ at exclusion of Brisbane Arena project from 2032 Games venue proposals

26th March 2025 - Regional venues feature in Brisbane 2032 infrastructure plans

25th March 2025 - Australia’s peak aquatic sports welcome announcement on Brisbane National Aquatics Centre

25th March 2025 - Stadium at Victoria Park confirmed as main Brisbane 2032 Games venue

24th March 2025 - Developing Ballymore as Brisbane 2032 hockey venue ‘a waste of money’

23rd March 2025 - Speculation mounts over Brisbane 2032 venues review panel recommendations

21st March 2025 - Australia’s peak Aquatic Sports renew calls for legacy Brisbane Olympic aquatic centre

---

Support our industry news service
We hope that you value the news that we publish so while you're here can we ask for your support?

As an independent publisher, we need reader support for our industry news gathering so ask that - if you don't already do so - you back us by subscribing to the printed Australasian Leisure Management magazine and/or our online news.